Employability of the Tools and Techniques of Data Mining for the Effective Detection of Fake Reviews

Vanshika Batra

Vol. 7, Jan-Dec 2021

Page Number: 135 - 142

Abstract:

These days, when someone needs to come to certain conclusions about an item or a help, everybody goes with the surveys or reviews as it has become a fundamental part of users. At the point when a client needs to place an order for an item on an eCommerce site, right off the bat, everybody checks the survey area thoroughly and other returns for go-getting about the item. He might arrange the item if the surveys posted were palatable for the client. In this manner, surveys have turned into a rumoured perimeter for organizations. What's more, organizations and an incredible abundance of client data. Each client believes that the surveys they are seeing are reasonable, and any control from people or opponent organizations might prompt phoney information, which will be marked as phoney surveys. This kind of work, if not seen, may allow us to consider the gen-solidarity of the information. So these audits are the main boundary for organizations and communities. A few groups of people use these surveys to produce clients for their advantage or harm their competitor's reputations. To take care of this issue, we use AI techniques (Supervised and semi-regulated) to identify regardless of whether the given survey is fake with high accuracy. Alongside this goal, we also focus on creating models needing less training data. Since we can't necessarily, in all cases, be ready to get marked information, we use semi-supervised AI to use unlabeled information. Naturally, our model ought to be fit for giving outcomes quicker than expected. This paper proposes multiple algorithms like the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest calculation (RF) and Deep neural network (DNN).

References

• Chengai Sun, Qiaolin Du and Gang Tian, “Exploiting Product Related Review Features for Fake Review Detection,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.
• A. Heydari, M. A. Tavakoli, N. Salim, and Z. Heydari, ”Detection of review spam: a survey”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3634–3642, 2015.
• M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock, “Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination,” in Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL-HLT), vol. 1, pp. 309–319, Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Ore, USA, June 2011.
• J. W. Pennebaker, M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth, ”Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: Liwc,” vol. 71, 2001.
• S. Feng, R. Banerjee, and Y. Choi, “Syntactic stylometry for deception detection,” in Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers, Vol. 2, 2012.
• J. Li, M. Ott, C. Cardie, and E. Hovy, “Towards a general rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam,” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2014.
• E. P. Lim, V.-A. Nguyen, N. Jindal, B. Liu, and H. W. Lauw, “Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors,” in Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2010.
• J. K. Rout, A. Dalmia, and K.-K. R. Choo, “Revisiting semi-supervised learning for online deceptive review detection,” IEEE Access, Vol. 5, pp. 1319–1327, 2017.
• J. Karimpour, A. A. Noroozi, and S. Alizadeh, “Web spam detection by learning from small labeled samples,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 1–5, July 2012.

Back Download