Learning & Teaching of Mathematics using Concept Mapping: A Technical Review 
                
                                     Naresh Kumar Seni
                                         Dr. Jaya  Kushwah
                                    
                
                 Vol. 7, Issue 1, Jan-Dec 2021
                 Page Number: 99 - 116
                                   Abstract: 
                The current thesis was performed with the aim of examining how students and teachers in Learning and Teaching of Mathematics using Concept Mapping use it. Experienced professors are often faced with the challenge of presenting courses or content in a way that students understand and enjoy by hands-on instruction. A compromise may be to reduce the amount of instructional material. Unquestionably, changes are needed, not so much in terms of content as in terms of presentation. A description map is a diagram that shows how definitions are related to one another. It is a graphical platform for organizing and visualizing section or theme material. The phrases (concepts) are often written in "balloons," with lines and, if possible, words defining their relationship connecting them. Describe an experiment in which two groups of students were given different directions for creating conceptual maps in this paper. The experiment revealed that concept maps had a broad range of mathematical applications.
                                            
              References
              
                                  - Englund, T. (2000). Rethinking democracy and education: towards an education of eliberativeitizens. Journal of Curriculum studies, 32(2), 305-313.
 
                                        - Billett, S. (2014). Learning in the circumstances of practice. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(5), 674-693.
 
                                        - Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Bob, G. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. cambridge University press.
 
                                        - Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American educational research journal, 28(1), 117-153.
 
                                        - Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education.
 
                                        - Usabiaga, C., Fernández, J. M., & Cerezuela, M. Ã. (1985). Aproximación didáctica al método cientÃfico. Narcea.
 
                                        - Hernández Pina, F., MartÃnez Clares, P., Da Fonseca, P., & Rubio EspÃn, M. (2005). Aprendizaje, competencias y rendimiento en Educación Superior (Madrid, La Muralla).
 
                                        - Jiménez, G., & Fe Y DÃez Barrabés, M. (2004). Las didácticas especÃficas: consideraciones sobre principios y actividades. Revista complutense de educación, 15(1), 253-286.
 
                                        - De Miguel D´ıaz, M. (coord), Alfaro Rocher, I.J., Apodaca Urquijo, P.M., AriasBlanco,J.M., Garc´ıa Jim´enez, E., Lobato Fraile, C., et al. (2006). Metodolog´ıa de Ense˜nanza y Aprendizaje para el Desarrollo de Competencias. Madrid: Alianza.
 
                                        - Prelooker, M. M. (1979). Tratado de lógica y conocimiento cientÃfico (No. 121 T7/v. 1/v. 5).
 
                                        - HERNÃNDEZ PINA, F., MARTÃNEZ CLARES, P., DA FONSECA, P., & RUBIO ESPÃN, M. (2005). Aprendizaje, competencias y rendimiento en Educación Superior (Madrid, La Muralla).
 
                                        - Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British journal of educational psychology, 46(1), 4-11
 
                                        - Marton, F., & Säaljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning—ii Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. british Journal of educational Psychology, 46(2), 115-127
 
                                        - Hernández Pina, F., MartÃnez Clares, P., Da Fonseca, P., & Rubio EspÃn, M. (2005). Aprendizaje, competencias y rendimiento en Educación Superior (Madrid, La Muralla).
 
                                        - Polya, G., & Zugazagoitia, J. (1965). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas (No. 04; QA11, P6.). México: Trillas.
 
                                        - Roman, M., & DÃez, E. (1999). CurrÃculum y evaluación: diseños curriculares aplicados. Madrid: Complutense.
 
                                        - Hernández Pina, F., MartÃnez Clares, P., Fonseca, P. D., & Rubio, M. (2005). Aprendizaje, competencias yrednimiento en educacion.
 
                                        - Torres, C. (2009). Los esquemas de texto. Aspectos psicolingüÃsticos, composicionales y textuales a partir deunatarea realizada por estudiantes universitarios. Signo y seña, (21), 199-217.
 
                                        - Casassus, J. (2003). La escuela y la (des) igualdad. Lom Ediciones
 
                                  
                  Back Download